![]() In this state of sincere pursuit of the Truth, the Holy Spirit is well able to work intimately with each person to convey an intended, designed application of Scripture. Jesus came as the physical embodiment (or, manifestation) of that Word ("Word made Flesh"). Consequently, a suggestion of reading, no - studying multiple translations will serve to empower the seeker with a better academic understanding of both literal and figurative conveyances of Holy Scripture.ĭuring this process the seeker (either "saved" or as yet "unsaved") is also inherently posturing himself/herself to be open to the working (enlightenment, conviction, incentive, etc.) of the Holy Spirit - the SOURCE of the communication of the original Word to man. Translations that are less accurate and best avoided as actual translations of scripture are loose paraphrases like the Message and cult translations like the New World translation by the Jehovah's witnesses.įor a list of good translations that are 'easy to read,' and hence easier as starter Bibles or for devotional Bibles, see: ĭaniel Hitson While God's Word to man is infallible, it was mentioned that for reasons provided, any linguististic translation cannot fully propagate the original infallibility. In general, most English translations are going to be over 99.5% accurate, with minimal variance between them. While this 'downgrading' of verses to footnotes is upsetting to many KJV purists who prefer the original, it is more accurate in regards to faithful translation by checking the reliability of manuscript variances. ![]() The NKJV updates the older King James Version by using more modern English words to avoid confusion, and by footnoting verses that have been shown by textual criticism to be dubious and likely later additions. For these, only the KJV or NKJV is really a candidate for 'most accurate.' While the NASB is generally considered the 'closest translation' and the 'most literal', there are many scholars and Christians who prefer translations based off of the Byzantium texts alone for the New Testament and eschew the Alexandrian texts. These translational notes are invaluable for those worried about getting the most accurate translation possible.įor even more accuracy, you can find NASB study Bibles that underline key words that link with a Hebrew and Greek lexicon in the back. Verses that are not clearly scripture are placed in footnotes rather than the main text. The NASB also restricts scripture to the oldest and best manuscripts available. Most Bible scholars agree, as the NASB is generally agreed to be the most literal of the English translations, reflecting Hebrew and Greek grammar and style the best. ![]() It is a 'literal' translation, holding to the formal equivalence school of thought that the translation should be as literal as possible. The New American Standard Bible holds the reputation of being the most accurate Bible translation in English. Here is a list of the 'closest' Bible translations in English: And thought-for-thought often make great devotional Bibles. Word-for-word often make great study Bibles. Due to this, it is often helpful not to pick just 'one' translation to read, but to find several good ones that have different strengths. (There are also 'paraphrases', like the Message Bible or NLT, but as faithfulness to the text is not a main concern for them they would not make a list of 'most accurate' translations.) To overcome this hurdle, English translations generally run from the spectrum of word-for-word literal translations, that try their best to translate words into their closest counterparts even if some meaning is lost, to thought-for-thought translations that seek to express the meaning of the original passage in a new language, which allows Hebrew and Greek idioms to be better expressed in English. It is actually impossible to perfectly translate one language into another, due to each language having different grammar, cultural idioms, and words that are not always directly synonymous with a counterpart in a different language. This has led to most translations being based primarily on either Byzantium manuscripts or Alexandrian texts. This school of study is called 'textual criticism'. Jennifer Rothnie Supporter Housewife, Artist, Perpetually Curious Since we no longer have any original manuscript, scholars have to compare later transcriptions and translations to determine what the most likely original reading was.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |